Note de 5 sur 5
Great value
Really lightweight, perfectly designed for women. I did the Salkantay trek (Machu. Picchu, 5 day trek) with it and it was the perfect size if you don’t have to carry your food
Passer à la navigation supérieure
Accéder à mon panier
Passer au contenu principal
Passer aux liens du pied de page
Avis
Evelyne D. Laurel P. Note de 4 sur 5Solid, Ultralight Backpack
I haven't had the opportunity to put this bag through it's paces but on a quick hike it has shown itself to be impeccable light. The bag is slim so it does take some maneuvering time pack if you are used to packs in a more standard width. The side compression webbing is a touch challenging to work with so I wouldn't put anything you need trail access to on the sides if you can help it. Otherwise this seems like another great pack from Osprey.
Karine B. Note de 5 sur 5Léger, confortable et beaucoup d’espace de rangement
Le sac ideal pour les randonnées de 2jours et plus! Le sac est parfaitement ajusté à ma taille, je mesure 5’10 et j’ai acheté la grandeur M. très confortable et ultra leger! J’adore!
Andre L. Note de 5 sur 5The most comfy and light bag ever
I was looking for an ultralight bag that would allow me to do backpacking hiking and still be comfortable and well adjusted. This answered all of my demands. The only thing I would change on this bag is the lack of small pockets on the hip belt, but that's such a tiny thing that its not worth docking a star for!
Alex W. Note de 4 sur 5Great for short trips!
The bag is super comfortable, the back mesh makes it feel extra lightweight. Sadly, no belt pockets, but if you have flexible shoulders, reaching into the side pockets works too! Fits enough for an overnight trip and the size is within the restraints for a carry on for flights!
Shannon T. Note de 2 sur 5Wanted this to work
I have the Exos men’s 48l and wanted to try a women’s 38l for daytrips in the alpine. It fits really small, and still came to the top of my head even though that was what I was trying to avoid. I want and need to be able to look up without the back of my head hitting the top of the pack, or even preventing me from looking up. I also did not like how it wings out at the sides, by the hip belt, I felt these would be constantly bugging me when grabbing shrubs etc, arms and elbows would always be hitting these. Bizarre feature in my opinion. I love the blue colour though.
Emkay Note de 3 sur 5Big difference between small & medium size for appearance and loading efficiency
I am an in-between size and ordered medium first to see how it would fit. I am 5’4” average frame. While the shoulder straps fit very well and the capacity was good, it was very tall and the top of the pack was hitting the back of my head. So I ordered the small size hoping everything would be the same except for the height. What a huge difference between two sizes, though. There is supposed to be only 3L volume difference between two sizes but in reality the small size seemed much smaller and not efficient for loading - perhaps due to it being not as deep? Overall the small size fits better but I find that I couldn’t load it as efficiently because it is long and narrow and shallow. I purchased this for long day hikes (8-10 hrs), and it would likely be too frustrating to try and get to items that are on the bottom. I wish they made the small size as deep as the medium size, for ease of loading/unloading. I currently have Osprey Sirrus 24, and was looking for something a bit bigger without adding weight, but Eja 38 did not satisfy that purpose for me. Based on my experience with both small & medium size, the medium size would work but it would be appropriate for someone taller than 5’4”. I found the small size to be inefficient for volume-to-usage purpose, and am sending them back. Three stars is for small size Eja 38 only. Would recommend only medium size, to taller friends! I’ve tried Eja 58L as well (but for backpacking), and note that my rating/review on that is different.